Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Proposal sans timeline

Institutionalizing Violence

This research will look to understand institutional forms of violence – how they are formed and develop. The first part of the research will be aimed at describing of the basic components of the coherent social context, derived from sociological theory, and how institutions are embedded in these contexts. I will argue that the coherent social context is made up of a social structure or field, agents, discourse, events, and an environment. Institutions are regularly reproduced structural relations, explicit in discourse, which agents understand and are able to perform to the point of taking the situation for granted and expect a certain series or sets of events to occur. The second part will be aimed at creating a uniform definition and typology of violence from the currently disjointed understanding of violence. I will limit violence to physical harm and categorize the types of violence according to the group affiliations and intimacy-level between those involved. The final part will attempt to explain how the types of violence become regularized in the social context institutionally and how these institutions of violence change over time. I will argue that institutionalized violence is an event brought about by escalating tensions between in- and out-group agents which reoccur and become taken-for-granted via the institutionalized structures, discourses, and roles embedded in social structure, individual habitus, and common knowledge. These violent events develop as a number of factors change between violent agents including spatial distance, functional distance, and power inequality.

AREAS OF RESEARCH:

Institutional Theory: Economic institutionalism, historical institutionalism, sociological institutionalism

Fligstein, Neil. “Organizations: Theoretical Debates and the Scope of Organizational

Theory.” http://sociology.berkeley.edu/faculty/fligstein/fligstein_pdf/ inter.handbook.paper.pdf. Accessed June 21, 2007.

---. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields” In Sociological Theory 19 no. 2 (2001): 105-

125.

Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New

Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (1996): 936-957.

Powell, Walter W. and Paul J. DiMaggio, editors. The New Institutionalism in

Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

Sjöstrand, Sven-Erik, editor. Institutional Change: Theory and Empirical Findings.

Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1993.

Social Context: Functionalist approaches, phenomenology, Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice, Goffman’s Dramaturgy

Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality. New York:

Doubleday, 1967.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans.

Richard Nice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984.

---. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. New York:

Cambridge University Press, 1977;

Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.

Luhmann, Niklas. Social Systems. Trans. John Bednarz Jr. with Dirk Baecker. Stanford,

CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.

Categorizations of Violence: Philosophical, sociological, anthropological, political science

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans.

Richard Nice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984.

---. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. New York:

Cambridge University Press, 1977;

Cudd, Anne. Analyzing Oppression. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006.

Feierabend, Ivo K., Rosalind L. Feierabend and Ted Robert Gurr, editors. Anger,

Violence, and Politics: Theories and Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1972.

Nordstrom, Carolyn and JoAnn Martin, editors. The Paths to Domination, Resistance,

and Terror. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.

Signorielli, Nancy, editor. Violence in the Media: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara,

Calif.: ABC-CLIO, 2005.

Key Resources for Instances of Violence: Case studies and histories of violence

Bart, Pauline B. and Eileen Geil Moran, editors. Violence Against Women: The Bloody

Footprints. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993.

Björgo, Tore and Rob Witte, editors. Racist Violence in Europe. New York, N.Y.: St.

Martin's Press, 1993.

Gurr, Ted, editor. Peoples versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century.

Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2000.

Heitmeyer, Wilhelm and John Hagan, editors. International Handbook of Violence

Research. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003

Institutionalizing Violence Resources: Social psychology, post-structuralism, sociology, political science, peace studies, anthropology.

Brewer, Marilynn B. and Miles Hewstone, editors. Social Cognition. Malden, MA:

Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

Brubaker, Rogers and David D. Laitin, “Ethnic and Nationalist Violence” The Annual

Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 423-452.

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan.

New York: Vintage Books, 1977.

----. The History of Sexuality. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.\

Hinton, Alexander Laban, editor Annihilating Difference: The Anthropology of Genocide.

Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.

Mann, Michael. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. New York:

Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Staub, Ervin “Genocide and Mass Killing: Origins, Prevention, Healing and

Reconciliation” Political Psychology 21 no. 2. (2000): pp. 367-382.

4 comments:

Haiz said...

Jason,
Very interesting and ambitious topic. Thank you for the source recommendations. A couple of questions: How have you arrived at your definition of an institution? and more importantly, Why are you limiting your definition of violence to only physical harm? How then would you characterize emotional/psychological abuse? The issue seems complicated further in that these forms of abuse often are associated with physical abuse/violence (see Abu Ghraib). It seems a thorough defense of this position might be necessary.
Good Luck.

Dr. B said...

Jason,

Haiz has raised some questions, and we did discuss this some last Thursday.

Keep working on this so that you can get the parameters for what you are going to include established soon enough to develop a realistic time line.

amandamarie said...

Hey Jason,
I would really like to get together and talk to you about your thesis. I have a concentration in my paper on authority.. but my backgroung lends itself to what your discussing. Anyways, Ill give you a better critique later, but lets combine forces (like captain planet style).

amandamarie said...

On a closer look, limiting yourself to physical harm-would that include self-inflicted physical harm... which stems from violence and seeing violence. Also on Haiz's note about Abu-Ghraib you should look into Zimbardo's study. Originally stemming from his 'Standford Prison Project' he wrote a wonderful essay on Abu Graib (situating the standford results within). Mostly to the affect of : its not a bad apple that spoils the bunch its the basket (apple-container/ institution) itself.