Institutionalizing Violence
This research will look to understand institutional forms of violence – how they are formed and develop. The first part of the research will be aimed at describing of the basic components of the coherent social context, derived from sociological theory, and how institutions are embedded in these contexts. I will argue that the coherent social context is made up of a social structure or field, agents, discourse, events, and an environment. Institutions are regularly reproduced structural relations, explicit in discourse, which agents understand and are able to perform to the point of taking the situation for granted and expect a certain series or sets of events to occur. The second part will be aimed at creating a uniform definition and typology of violence from the currently disjointed understanding of violence. I will limit violence to physical harm and categorize the types of violence according to the group affiliations and intimacy-level between those involved. The final part will attempt to explain how the types of violence become regularized in the social context institutionally and how these institutions of violence change over time. I will argue that institutionalized violence is an event brought about by escalating tensions between in- and out-group agents which reoccur and become taken-for-granted via the institutionalized structures, discourses, and roles embedded in social structure, individual habitus, and common knowledge. These violent events develop as a number of factors change between violent agents including spatial distance, functional distance, and power inequality.
AREAS OF RESEARCH:
Institutional Theory: Economic institutionalism, historical institutionalism, sociological institutionalism
Fligstein, Neil. “Organizations: Theoretical Debates and the Scope of Organizational
Theory.” http://sociology.berkeley.edu/faculty/fligstein/fligstein_pdf/ inter.handbook.paper.pdf. Accessed
---. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields” In Sociological Theory 19 no. 2 (2001): 105-
125.
Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New
Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (1996): 936-957.
Powell, Walter W. and Paul J. DiMaggio, editors. The New Institutionalism in
Organizational Analysis.
Sjöstrand, Sven-Erik, editor. Institutional Change: Theory and Empirical Findings.
Social Context: Functionalist approaches, phenomenology, Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice, Goffman’s Dramaturgy
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality.
Doubleday, 1967.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans.
Richard Nice.
---. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice.
Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis.
Luhmann, Niklas. Social Systems. Trans. John Bednarz Jr. with Dirk Baecker. Stanford,
CA:
Categorizations of Violence: Philosophical, sociological, anthropological, political science
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans.
Richard Nice.
---. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice.
Cudd, Anne. Analyzing Oppression.
Feierabend, Ivo K., Rosalind L. Feierabend and Ted Robert Gurr, editors. Anger,
Violence, and Politics: Theories and Research.
Nordstrom, Carolyn and JoAnn Martin, editors. The Paths to Domination, Resistance,
and Terror.
Signorielli, Nancy, editor. Violence in the Media: A Reference Handbook.
Key Resources for Instances of Violence: Case studies and histories of violence
Bart, Pauline B. and Eileen Geil Moran, editors. Violence Against Women: The Bloody
Footprints.
Björgo, Tore and Rob Witte, editors. Racist Violence in
Martin's Press, 1993.
Gurr, Ted, editor. Peoples versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century.
Heitmeyer, Wilhelm and John Hagan, editors. International Handbook of Violence
Research.
Brewer, Marilynn B. and Miles Hewstone, editors. Social Cognition.
Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Brubaker, Rogers and David D. Laitin, “Ethnic and Nationalist Violence” The Annual
Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 423-452.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan.
----. The History of Sexuality. Trans. Robert Hurley.
Hinton, Alexander Laban, editor Annihilating Difference: The Anthropology of Genocide.
Mann, Michael. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing.
Staub, Ervin “Genocide and Mass Killing: Origins, Prevention, Healing and
Reconciliation” Political Psychology 21 no. 2. (2000): pp. 367-382.
4 comments:
Jason,
Very interesting and ambitious topic. Thank you for the source recommendations. A couple of questions: How have you arrived at your definition of an institution? and more importantly, Why are you limiting your definition of violence to only physical harm? How then would you characterize emotional/psychological abuse? The issue seems complicated further in that these forms of abuse often are associated with physical abuse/violence (see Abu Ghraib). It seems a thorough defense of this position might be necessary.
Good Luck.
Jason,
Haiz has raised some questions, and we did discuss this some last Thursday.
Keep working on this so that you can get the parameters for what you are going to include established soon enough to develop a realistic time line.
Hey Jason,
I would really like to get together and talk to you about your thesis. I have a concentration in my paper on authority.. but my backgroung lends itself to what your discussing. Anyways, Ill give you a better critique later, but lets combine forces (like captain planet style).
On a closer look, limiting yourself to physical harm-would that include self-inflicted physical harm... which stems from violence and seeing violence. Also on Haiz's note about Abu-Ghraib you should look into Zimbardo's study. Originally stemming from his 'Standford Prison Project' he wrote a wonderful essay on Abu Graib (situating the standford results within). Mostly to the affect of : its not a bad apple that spoils the bunch its the basket (apple-container/ institution) itself.
Post a Comment